Daily Bulletin

The Conversation

  • Written by The Conversation Contributor

The temporary deficit levy might be here to stay if Labor is elected. The tax, which targets the wealthy, was actually introduced by the Coalition in 2014 as a means of reducing the budget deficit.

The levy is a 2% increase in the top personal income tax rate from 45% to 47%, which amounts to 49% including the 2% Medicare Levy. It was originally due to expire after three years and the Turnbull Government has planned to honour this. If the Coalition is elected it will end after June 2017.

In his 2014 Federal Budget speech, then Treasurer Joe Hockey said:

“Tonight we are asking higher income earners to help repair the Budget. From 1 July this year and for just three years, we are asking higher income earners to pay a Temporary Budget Repair Levy.”

Temporary pain for the budget gain. These types of levies have become popular in Australia and overseas. Australia had the Queensland Flood Levy in 2011 and a New South Wales government temporary levy on point-to-point transport providers in 2015. The governments in the United States and Canada have imposed many of these levies as well. These are really just disingenuous tax rises that subsequent governments find irresistibly tempting to prolong beyond their original use by date.

Labor argues that the temporary deficit levy should be kept for two reasons – it raises much needed revenue and it’s fair. The levy raises about A$1 billion in revenue per year, over each of the next four years. Given a budget deficit of A$37 billion or 2.2% of GDP, keeping the temporary deficit levy reduces the budget deficit by about 3%.

Raising revenue is one way of reducing the budget deficit, reducing spending is the other. Labor argues that the Coalition government has a revenue problem more than a spending problem.

The debate about whether Australia has a revenue problem or a spending problem is like asking whether a person has a weight problem or an eating problem – you wouldn’t have the first if you didn’t have the second.

Governments raise taxes to finance spending. The Coalition government argues that it is important to try to live within its means than hit up taxpayers for more revenue.

It is true that Australia is not a particularly highly taxed country, but it relies relatively heavily on income tax and our top personal income tax rate, it’s high by international standards. Labor wants the top tax rate to remain 2% higher, by keeping the TDL, on fairness grounds.

The problem with Labor’s fairness argument to the temporary deficit levy is that we have no generally accepted standard of tax fairness. There are on the other hand more or less generally agreed standards for a bunch of economic indicators: the maximum sustainable economic growth rate, the lowest sustainable unemployment rate, an ideal target inflation rate.

While we have summary indicators of fairness, like the Gini coefficient which is a numerical measure of the distribution of income, we have no agreed ideal number to shoot for. This is partly because it depends on subjective value judgements.

Another problem with the fairness argument is that it cannot validly be applied to a particular tax or welfare measure. We need to look at the whole package of government income redistributive measures including superannuation, family tax benefits, disability payments and so on. One measure may offset another, so it is misleading to look at one change in isolation.

We do know that high marginal income tax rates – and they are high in Australia - have real economic costs that curb average living standards due to the disincentive effects on work, but again there is considerable debate about the size of these costs. A combination of inherent value judgements and uncertain costs make the debate about high marginal tax rates, like the temporary deficit levy, fertile ground for political rhetoric.

However it would help if we had a more transparent framework for measuring and reporting the impact of government budgets on established indicators of fairness.

Authors: The Conversation Contributor

Read more http://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-the-temporary-deficit-levy-and-why-was-it-introduced-60432

Writers Wanted

Solitaire Card Game Rules Every Gamer Should Know


Asian countries do aged care differently. Here's what we can learn from them


The Conversation


Prime Minister Interview with Kieran Gilbert, Sky News

KIERAN GILBERT: Kieran Gilbert here with you and the Prime Minister joins me. Prime Minister, thanks so much for your time.  PRIME MINISTER: G'day Kieran.  GILBERT: An assumption a vaccine is ...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Did BLM Really Change the US Police Work?

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has proven that the power of the state rests in the hands of the people it governs. Following the death of 46-year-old black American George Floyd in a case of ...

a Guest Writer - avatar a Guest Writer

Scott Morrison: the right man at the right time

Australia is not at war with another nation or ideology in August 2020 but the nation is in conflict. There are serious threats from China and there are many challenges flowing from the pandemic tha...

Greg Rogers - avatar Greg Rogers

Business News

Top 5 US Logistics Companies

Nothing is more annoying than having to deal with unreliable shipping companies for your fragile and important packages. Other than providing the best customer service, a logistics company also ne...

News Co - avatar News Co

Luke Lazarus Helps Turns Startups into Global Stalwarts

There are many positive aspects to globalization. It is no secret that those who have been impacted by globalization tend to enjoy a higher standard of living in general. One factor that has led to ...

Emma Davidson - avatar Emma Davidson

Digital-based strategies that grow and expand your business

Small and medium-sized businesses are increasingly relying on new technology solutions to strengthen their product development, marketing, and customer engagement activities. Technology adoption...

News Co - avatar News Co

News Co Media Group

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion