Daily Bulletin

Men's Weekly

.

  • Written by Drew Rooke, Deputy Science + Technology Editor, The Conversation
Should Australia establish an independent body to investigate scientific misconduct? We asked 5 experts

Most of us trust scientists. We believe they are not just competent, but honest as well.

This belief is well-founded. However, scientists are also human – and sometimes they can make mistakes. These mistakes can be accidental. But they can also be intentional, as the rising number of academic papers retracted on the grounds of scientific misconduct demonstrates.

Scientific misconduct – which includes data fabrication, falsification and misrepresentation, and is being fuelled by artificial intelligence – isn’t merely an academic problem. Medical studies based on misleading or falsified data, for example, can harm human health. In extreme cases, scientific misconduct can also prove fatal.

Different countries have different approaches to tackling this problem. Sweden and Denmark are often lauded as “world-leaders” for establishing independent bodies that have the power to investigate allegations of scientific misconduct.

Australia has no such body. It instead relies on a self-regulation model, whereby universities assess and investigate scientific misconduct cases involving their staff internally.

Should Australia follow the approach of its international peers and establish an independent body that has the power to investigate scientific misconduct cases? We asked five experts. Three answered yes. Even the two who answered no said Australia could do more to protect research integrity.

Disclosure statements

Jason Chin is a board member of the Association for Interdisciplinary Metaresearch and Open Science (AIMOS), a charity that seeks to study and improve science.

Dane McCamey is involved in overseeing research ethics and compliance at UNSW.

Jennifer Byrne receives funding from the NHMRC. She is the current recipient of the Professor David Vaux Research Integrity Fellowship (2025–2026) offered by the Australian Academy of Science. She is also a Research Integrity Advisor at the University of Sydney.

Ben W. Mol receives funding from NHMRC, MRFF, as well as international competitive grants.

Nicholas Fisk served as Dean Medicine and Health at the University of Queensland (2010-16) and DVC Research and Enterprise at UNSW (2016–24). He is a board member of the peak body Research Australia.

Authors: Drew Rooke, Deputy Science + Technology Editor, The Conversation

Read more https://theconversation.com/should-australia-establish-an-independent-body-to-investigate-scientific-misconduct-we-asked-5-experts-270460

Business News

How Thorough Component Inspections Protect Your Supply Chain from Costly Failures

In the modern world, where manufacturing has become highly interconnected, the weakest components of the supply chain can only make the chain as strong as it is. One defective component might cause ...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

3PL Logistics in Australia: Strengthening Supply Chains for Growing Businesses

Australia’s vast geography and diverse consumer markets make logistics a critical part of business success. As companies scale and customer expectations rise, many turn to 3pl logistics australia to...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Why Choosing The Right Shopify Web Developer Shapes Long-Term Ecommerce Success

Building a Shopify store that performs reliably over time requires more than surface-level setup. Working with an experienced Shopify web developer ensures that the platform is configured with inten...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Speed Dating For Business