Daily Bulletin


Daily Bulletin

The Conversation

  • Written by The Conversation
imageCultural leadership may not be the same as leadership in the other arenas.Elliot Margolies

Cultural leadership has been under the spotlight in recent times. Or maybe “under the microscope” is a better turn of phrase – as you’d be forgiven for not seeing it clearly from a distance.

Most of the action is coming from the performing arts sector, with theatre historian Katharine Brisbane arguing we need cultural leaders as much as we need obsessive artists in the recently released Platform Paper The Arts and the Common Good.

This followed calls from directors Ralph Myers and Wesley Enoch for renewed exuberance in the realm of arts leadership.

Both expressed concern that our artistic leaders are being subsumed by those with a business approach. Cultural leaders need to be risk takers, they all argue – and maybe those in the sector are just a little too comfortable.

Comfort is likely not widely felt in the arts sector so soon after the release of the 2015 Budget.

While ABC and SBS employees may be relieved, the rest of the sector is coming to terms with further cuts to Screen Australia and the Australia Council – and the creation of the new A$104.8 million National Centre for Excellence in the Arts.

While operational details are still to come, it looks like this new player on the cultural landscape will bring the role of the federal Arts ministry front and centre into decisions of funding allocation, a direct challenge to the “arms length” model that has operated for nearly half a century.

Writing on ArtsHub on budget night, Ben Eltham suggested the impact will likely be felt mostly in the small to medium sector, the place we grow most of our future leaders. For potential leaders who consider speaking out and challenging the status quo, such as those who threatened to boycott the Sydney Biennale in 2014, the economic consequences may be dire.

Understanding cultural leadership

The reluctance to discuss leadership, or indeed stand up and be counted as a leader, in the Australian cultural industries is a common theme encountered in my research.

To understand how cultural leaders develop their skills, knowledge and attributes I have set out to ask them, and those around who support their development.

What I hadn’t predicted was unwillingness by those who have significant industry experience and who are recognised as emerging leaders in their field to have the label “leader” ascribed to them.

Across disciplines, ages, genders and practice types the view has been the same. They didn’t have enough experience they said, they weren’t bosses of people, they work collaboratively or, in classic Australian form, they didn’t want to be seen as “up themselves”.

The problem with leadership is it’s a construction that comes into being from a variety of different sources. Despite masses of research over decades there is no one singular definition of leadership. For many the term is a managerial buzzword, over-used and without value.

This is compounded by the media representations of leadership where the figure of the older, white, male authoritarian leader still dominates the worlds of business and sport.

In the cultural arena, when I tell people I’m studying leadership in the sector, many say “good luck finding them".

Two types of cultural leaders

But those we do see often fall into two highly-visible groups. There is the creatively-talented artistic director/symphony conductor/head curator who we often laud upon retirement or passing – and the benevolent philanthropists/board chairs who bestow their considerable business acumen to the arts.

The first instance harks back to the “great man” theories of early leadership studies, the idea that leadership, like creative genius, was supposedly born not made. In the latter case there is a paternalistic view that the cultural sector needs to bring in expertise from elsewhere, more robust leadership to bring order and sustainability to the challenging arts environment.

These are undoubtedly generalisations. There are many great leaders of differing genders, ethnicities and ages operating across the Australian cultural sector, but their names do not necessarily appear on many of the arts “power lists” that are published.

Often, true cultural leaders are not highly visible – and that may be because they are more focused on “doing” leadership than being seen as a leader.

Such innovative cultural leaders are quietly redefining leadership as a collaborative, relational, entrepreneurial, process, leading from behind, below, beside. Writing in The Australian last month, Matthew Westwood painted the following picture of cultural leadership:

Business and politics also produce admirable leaders, but cultural leaders are different. They have particular qualities. They do not wait to be elected, or follow a trend, or conduct market research or opinion polls. Instead, they produce plays, symphonies and exhibitions, build museums or organise community choirs because their inner creative impetus drives them to do it.

The leaders we need

In her Platform Paper, Katharine Brisbane outlines the “risky, uncomfortable business” of being an arts practitioner in Australia – which in this post-budget world may have become just a bit riskier. She argues we must give trust and latitude to those who develop creative content if we are to produce the next great playwrights, composers or choreographers.

The same can be said of arts leaders, for we need to trust in their ability to craft a new, creative notion of leadership.

Two distinct audiences are now focused on the idea of cultural leadership.

Corporate leaders increasingly look toward those in creative roles for inspiration. As business leaders seek out innovation and creativity as the “silver bullet” to keep organisations competitive in the knowledge economy, the lessons learned from those in creative positions are seen as an important learning opportunity.

Universities too are now recognising the value of cultural leadership as a potential market and are launching programs, such as NIDA’s new in 2016 Master in Fine Arts in Cultural Leadership, Melbourne University’s Master of Arts and Cultural Management or the Master in Curating and Cultural Leadership at UNSW Art & Design.

For these programs to be truly innovative and provide benefit for those both within and outside the cultural sector they must recognise that cultural leadership may not be the same as leadership in the other arenas. The development of cultural leaders is not simply a matter as teaching them business skills.

We need cultural leadership programs, both within formal education and provided from organisations such as the Australia Council for the Arts, to cultivate and share leadership knowledge from within the sector, creating case studies and role models of real leaders operating today - even if they are reluctant to wear the tag.

Maybe then we won’t need to look so hard for our cultural leaders – because we need them more than ever.

Kim Goodwin does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

Authors: The Conversation

Read more http://theconversation.com/post-budget-we-need-strong-cultural-leaders-more-than-ever-41680

Writers Wanted

Phytonutrients can boost your health. Here are 4 and where to find them (including in your next cup of coffee)

arrow_forward

Healthcare, minerals, energy, food: how adopting new tech could drive Australia's economic recovery

arrow_forward

Review: new biography shows Vida Goldstein's political campaigns were courageous, her losses prophetic

arrow_forward

The Conversation
INTERWEBS DIGITAL AGENCY

Politics

Did BLM Really Change the US Police Work?

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has proven that the power of the state rests in the hands of the people it governs. Following the death of 46-year-old black American George Floyd in a case of ...

a Guest Writer - avatar a Guest Writer

Scott Morrison: the right man at the right time

Australia is not at war with another nation or ideology in August 2020 but the nation is in conflict. There are serious threats from China and there are many challenges flowing from the pandemic tha...

Greg Rogers - avatar Greg Rogers

Prime Minister National Cabinet Statement

The National Cabinet met today to discuss Australia’s COVID-19 response, the Victoria outbreak, easing restrictions, helping Australians prepare to go back to work in a COVID-safe environment an...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Business News

How To Remove Rubbish More Effectively

It can be a big task to remove household rubbish. The hardest part is finding the best way to get rid of your junk. It can be very overwhelming to know exactly where to start with so many option...

News Company - avatar News Company

4 Tips To Pass Skills Certifications Tests

Developing the right set of skills is valuable not only to your career, but for life in general. You can get certified in these skills through obtaining a license. Without a certified license, y...

News Company - avatar News Company

How to Secure Home-Based Entrepreneurs from Cyber Threats

Small businesses are becoming a trend nowadays. The people with entrepreneurial skills and minds are adopting home-based businesses because of their advantage and ease of working from home. But...

News Company - avatar News Company



News Company Media Core

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion