Building more houses quickly is harder than it looks. Australia hasn't done it in decades
- Written by Ehsan Gharaie, Associate Professor of Project Management, RMIT University
Thanks to HomeBuilder and the housing price boom, house building is experiencing its hottest year on the record.
Over the space of a year the number of houses (not apartments) under construction has jumped from 56,060 in the June quarter 2020 to 88,445 in the June quarter 2021 — the biggest peak of all time.
Houses under construction
Australian Bureau of Statistics
The 88,445 or more houses presently under construction will eventually be built, but it is going to take seriously longer than normal.
Our research shows every time the number of houses under construction has peaked, completion times have blown out.
Read more:
As home prices soar beyond reach, we have a government inquiry almost designed not to tell us why
During the smaller 2001-2008 construction boom, the average completion time blew out from 5.2 months to seven.
Our projections suggest this time it will sharply blow out from 6.5 months to more than nine by the end of this year.
The impact will be felt by hundreds of thousands of Australian house buyers, builders, subcontractors and lenders.
Why can’t we build faster?
Houses are not built on production lines. Unlike other universal purchases such as cars, each house is built individually.
And the method hasn’t changed much in 100 years.
The people we call builders are better described as project managers who rarely employ in-house tradespeople or have long-term contracts with subcontractors.
The way they manage the process has not changed much since the introduction of construction checklists by AV Jennings in the 1970s.
Read more:
Home prices are climbing alright, but not for the reason you might think
The method is hard to scale up, and unresponsive to demands for speed.
It is ripe for innovations such as offsite construction and prefabrication, but it isn’t clear the authorities are especially aware of the problem.
Now would be a good time. Builders could absorb the costs of changing processes while demand was high, taking advantage of the changes when demand recedes.
But I’m not hopeful. Too much talk is about housing supply in the abstract rather than how to achieve it concrete.
Authors: Ehsan Gharaie, Associate Professor of Project Management, RMIT University
Daily Bulletin
